Search
  • en
  • es
  • en
    Search
    Open menu Open menu

    AI-driven SDLC for mature engineering teams

    Delivery cycles shorten without quality regressions when execution runs through versioned specs, reusable workflows and orchestrated agents. Hypervelocity engineering applies to teams whose CI/CD and test suites already hold.

      Why it matters

      The ceiling of AI-assisted delivery is not the model. It is the context.

      Assistant adoption climbs stage by stage — 91% in implementation, 72% in requirements, 58% in design — and then stalls at the same limit. Long chat sessions degrade: earlier instructions drop out of the context window, outputs contradict each other and every new task restarts from zero.

      HVE moves the context out of the conversation and into artefacts: versioned specs, reusable workflows and agents with a defined scope, all reviewed like code. The unit of work stops being the prompt and becomes the workflow. The decision you face is not which assistant to buy, but which parts of your SDLC are stable enough to orchestrate.

      2,500+projects delivered since 2006. The workflows we orchestrate come from that delivery history, not from a template
      Aigües Carglass Hermes Sage Telefónica Willbo Acciona Mediaset Microsoft Ferrovial Coca-Cola Iberdrola
      What high-velocity means

      Structured workflows compound. Ad-hoc prompting does not.

      Two trajectories over the same twelve months. Chat-based assistance plateaus as context is lost between sessions; workflow-level execution keeps compounding because the context is an artifact, not a conversation.

      Hypervelocity engineering. Structured workflows, reusable specs and orchestrated agents.
      Ad-hoc prompting. Every developer restarts the context, and quality drifts with it.
      30-50%

      of chat-based sessions drift off-task after ten exchanges.

      Your problem, and what we do about it

      Why AI-assisted delivery plateaus, and what breaks the ceiling

      Adoption is not the problem: 91% of teams already use AI in implementation. What fails is everything around the prompt.

      What you are dealing withWhat we put in place

      Context lossLong conversations degrade. Previous instructions are forgotten and outputs contradict each other across a session.

      Context as an artifactStandards, decisions and project knowledge stored where agents read them, so context survives the session.

      Ad-hoc promptingEach developer invents their own way of asking, and quality varies with who is at the keyboard.

      Structured workflowsReusable workflow definitions with checkpoints, so the tenth feature is faster than the first.

      Tasks, not workflowsAI accelerates isolated steps while the handoffs between them stay manual.

      Agent orchestrationResearch, implementation and validation delegated as a chain, with a human in the loop where the decision carries risk.

      No quality gate on AI outputGenerated code reaches review without anything having checked it against the criteria.

      Evaluation harnessAutomated evaluation against acceptance criteria before a human spends time on the change.

      Impossible to auditNo way to reconstruct which requirement produced which change.

      Traceability by constructionSpec to code to test mapped end to end, which is what makes an AI-driven pipeline auditable.

      What’s included

      What the engagement includes

      The workflows, agents and controls we put in place so delivery speed holds when the team changes. Not for teams without automated tests or a working CI/CD pipeline. HVE amplifies an existing SDLC, it does not replace one.

      Workstream 01

      Spec-first workflows

      Specification as the single source of truth, versioned with the code and used as the brief every agent works from.

      Workstream 02

      Context as an artifact

      Project knowledge, standards and decisions stored where agents read them, so context survives the session instead of degrading with it.

      Workstream 03

      Agent orchestration

      Research, implementation and validation delegated as chains of steps with checkpoints, with a human in the loop where the decision carries risk.

      Workstream 04

      Evaluation and traceability

      Automated evaluation of generated output against acceptance criteria, and every change traceable back to the spec that motivated it.

      Proven in production

      Where this has already been done

      Nestlé Nestlé case study

      Agents and GenAI accelerating development inside a global technology hub

      The challenge

      A technology hub that had to explore new innovation scenarios and scale solutions globally, without slowing down the teams already delivering.

      What we did

      We became their strategic technology partner, with a data science workstream where agents and GenAI accelerate development, testing and standardization from PoC to MVP.

      Outcome

      Solutions scaled globally, with AI embedded in the product development cycle.

      Read the full case study
      Recommended next step

      Assess your SDLC before orchestrating

      A two-hour session with your engineering leads. You leave with the readiness scoring, the first workflows worth orchestrating and a realistic gain estimate.

      Book the HVE readiness assessment