Search
  • en
  • es
  • en
    Search
    Open menu Open menu

    Engineering standards and governance for multi-team delivery

    Teams keep their autonomy without diverging: shared standards, CI policy gates and architecture decision records, applied across delivery teams rather than enforced pull request by pull request.

      Why it matters

      Ten teams, ten ways to build the same service

      Each team chooses its own patterns, its own pipeline and its own definition of done, and every choice is defensible in isolation. Together they slow onboarding, make code review inconsistent and keep technical debt invisible until it surfaces as run cost or an incident.

      Governance is what keeps autonomy from fragmenting. We set the standards your teams already half-agree on, wire them into repository templates, linters and CI policy gates, and record each decision once instead of relitigating it per project. The compliant path becomes the fastest path, which turns consistency from a review burden into a default you set once.

      1standard set, applied across every delivery team instead of one per team
      Aigües Carglass Hermes Sage Telefónica Willbo Acciona Mediaset Microsoft Ferrovial Coca-Cola Iberdrola
      How governance works

      One standard at the core, every team around it

      Not a review board that slows delivery down. A shared core of standards, patterns and guardrails that teams consume as defaults, with a light decision process for the exceptions.

      CoreShared engineering
      standards

      Architecture

      Patterns, APIs and reference designs reused across teams

      Delivery

      Pipelines, environments and definition of done

      Quality & security

      Gates, scanning and dependency policy applied everywhere

      Technical debt

      Identified, quantified and scheduled instead of accumulated

      Why Plain Concepts

      What makes this different

      Shared standards and patterns

      Reference architectures and practices defined once and consumed as defaults by every team.

      Golden paths

      Templates, starter repositories and pipelines that make the compliant path the fastest one.

      Decisions reviewed before building

      A lightweight ADR process applied at design time, with records that survive the people who wrote them.

      Deliverables

      What you take away

      Standards that live inside repository templates, linters and pipeline gates, not in a document nobody opens. Not for single-team engineering groups, or organisations without a platform team to own the standards after rollout.

      01

      Standards and pattern library

      02

      Templates and starter repos

      03

      ADR process and records

      04

      Debt register and governance model

      Recommended next step

      Review how your teams build

      Two sessions with your tech leads. You leave with a map of where practice diverges and the three standards worth setting first.

      Book the engineering review