What is ELT (Extraction, Loading, Transformation)?
Unlike the ETL process, which requires data transformations to be performed before loading the target system, the ELT process follows a different strategy. Instead of moving the data to an intermediate environment for transformation, ELT loads the raw data directly into the storage system and performs the transformations afterward.
Using the ELT data flow process, data cleansing, enrichment, and transformation are performed directly in our storage system. The raw data is stored permanently in that system, allowing multiple transformations to be performed at any time.
Cloud data warehousing systems such as Snowflake, Amazon Redshift, Google BigQuery, Azure Data Lake, Azure Synapse, among others, have the necessary digital infrastructure, both in terms of storage and processing power, to handle large volumes of data.
Although the ELT data pipeline is not universally used, its popularity is increasing as companies migrate their infrastructures to cloud environments.
ETL vs. ELT: How do these processes differ?
There are two main aspects that differentiate the ETL and ELT processes: the first is where the data transformation takes place, while the second is related to how the data is retained in the storage systems.
ETL transforms data on a separate processing server, while ELT transforms data within the data warehouse itself.
That is, ETL does not transfer data to the warehouse without first processing it, while ELT does send raw data directly to the warehouse.
In the case of ETL, the data ingestion process is slowed down by transforming the data on a separate server before the loading process.
In contrast, in the ELT process, faster data ingestion is offered because data is not sent to a secondary server for restructuring. In fact, with ELT, data can be loaded and transformed simultaneously.
ELT’s raw data retention creates an ideal historical archive for generating business intelligence. As objectives and strategies change, BI teams can revisit the raw data to develop new transformations using complete data sets. ETL, on the other hand, does not generate complete sets of raw data that can be queried again: it only stores data that has already been transformed.
These factors make ELT more flexible, efficient, and scalable, especially for ingesting large amounts of data, processing sets containing structured and unstructured data, and developing various business intelligence.
The way unstructured data is processed is crucial. At this time, ELT is the best option, as it provides superior processing of semi-structured and unstructured data compared to ETL, which is typically used for structured data.
Most of the data is unstructured (images, videos, PDF files, PowerPoint documents, etc.), so this type of data remains more difficult to access and process. In the future, the industry will focus on eliminating the difficulties and improving the interpretation of this unstructured data, and ELT will play an important role in this.
However, ETL is ideal for compute-intensive transformations, systems with legacy architectures, or data workflows that require manipulation before entering a target system, such as the removal of personally identifiable information (PII).
The ETL and ELT data pipeline includes cleansing and filtering, which are a key part of the data transformation process. And because the ETL method completes the transformation before uploading the data to the server, it is better for meeting privacy and security standards for the possibility of sensitive data transfer.
ETL vs. ELT Comparison
|Data is extracted from a source system, transformed on a secondary processing server, and loaded onto a target system.
|Data is extracted from a source system, loaded into a target system, and transformed within the target system.
|The raw data is extracted using API connectors.
|The raw data is extracted using API connectors.
|The raw data is transformed into a processing server.
|The raw data is transformed within the target system.
|The transformed data is loaded into a target system.
|The raw data is loaded directly into the target system.
|ETL is a time-consuming process; data is transformed before it is loaded into a target system.
|ELT is faster by comparison; data is loaded directly into a target system and transformed in parallel.
|They are performed on a secondary server. Best for computationally intensive transformations and pre-cleaning.
|Transformations performed on the database; simultaneous loading and transformations; speed and efficiency.
|Pre-loading transformation can eliminate PII (HIPPA support).
|Direct data upload requires more privacy safeguards.
|The secondary processing server increases the maintenance load.
|By using fewer systems, the maintenance load is reduced.
|The data are transformed before entering the target system; therefore, the raw data cannot be queried again.
|The raw data is loaded directly into the target system and can be queried indefinitely.
|Ideal for small data sets with complicated transformation requirements.
|Ideal for large data sets requiring speed and efficiency.Conclusion
Cloud data warehouses have given rise to a new frontier in data integration. Choosing between ETL and ELT processes depends on the needs of the team and the project.
However, for both cases, the goal is clear: to prepare data for analysis and use it for decision-making. The easiest way to resolve the ETL vs. ELT dilemma and understand their differences is to understand the T in both approaches. The critical factor that differentiates the two is when and where the execution of the transformation takes place.
Implementing an ELT process is more difficult compared to ETL. However, companies now prefer ELT to ETL because of faster performance, versatility, and scalability.
In contrast, ETL data pipelines create a more secure process for handling sensitive data and meeting compliance standards.
Whichever option is chosen, data teams across the spectrum are activating their integration strategies by leveraging a data integration platform. We can help you get one in place.